Pula wątków Java reprezentuje grupę wątków roboczych, które czekają na zadanie i są wielokrotnie wykorzystywane.
W przypadku puli wątków tworzona jest grupa wątków o stałym rozmiarze. Wątek z puli wątków jest pobierany i przydzielany do zadania przez usługodawcę. Po zakończeniu zadania wątek ponownie znajduje się w puli wątków.
Java konwertuje na ciąg
Metody puli wątków
newFixedThreadPool(int s): Metoda tworzy pulę wątków o stałym rozmiarze s.
nowyCachedThreadPool(): Metoda tworzy nową pulę wątków, która w razie potrzeby tworzy nowe wątki, ale nadal będzie korzystać z wcześniej utworzonego wątku, gdy tylko będą dostępne do użycia.
nowySingleThreadExecutor(): Metoda tworzy nowy wątek.
Zaleta puli wątków Java
Lepsza wydajność Oszczędza to czas, ponieważ nie ma potrzeby tworzenia nowego wątku.
Wykorzystanie w czasie rzeczywistym
Jest używany w serwletach i JSP, gdzie kontener tworzy pulę wątków w celu przetworzenia żądania.
Przykład puli wątków Java
Zobaczmy prosty przykład puli wątków Java przy użyciu usługi ExecutorService i modułów Executors.
Plik: WorkerThread.java
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService; import java.util.concurrent.Executors; class WorkerThread implements Runnable { private String message; public WorkerThread(String s){ this.message=s; } public void run() { System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+' (Start) message = '+message); processmessage();//call processmessage method that sleeps the thread for 2 seconds System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+' (End)');//prints thread name } private void processmessage() { try { Thread.sleep(2000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } } Plik: TestThreadPool.java
public class TestThreadPool { public static void main(String[] args) { ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(5);//creating a pool of 5 threads for (int i = 0; i <10; i++) { runnable worker="new" workerthread('' + i); executor.execute(worker); calling execute method of executorservice } executor.shutdown(); while (!executor.isterminated()) system.out.println('finished all threads'); < pre> <p> <strong>Output:</strong> </p> <pre>pool-1-thread-1 (Start) message = 0 pool-1-thread-2 (Start) message = 1 pool-1-thread-3 (Start) message = 2 pool-1-thread-5 (Start) message = 4 pool-1-thread-4 (Start) message = 3 pool-1-thread-2 (End) pool-1-thread-2 (Start) message = 5 pool-1-thread-1 (End) pool-1-thread-1 (Start) message = 6 pool-1-thread-3 (End) pool-1-thread-3 (Start) message = 7 pool-1-thread-4 (End) pool-1-thread-4 (Start) message = 8 pool-1-thread-5 (End) pool-1-thread-5 (Start) message = 9 pool-1-thread-2 (End) pool-1-thread-1 (End) pool-1-thread-4 (End) pool-1-thread-3 (End) pool-1-thread-5 (End) Finished all threads </pre> download this example <h2>Thread Pool Example: 2</h2> <p>Let's see another example of the thread pool.</p> <p> <strong>FileName:</strong> ThreadPoolExample.java</p> <pre> // important import statements import java.util.Date; import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService; import java.util.concurrent.Executors; import java.text.SimpleDateFormat; class Tasks implements Runnable { private String taskName; // constructor of the class Tasks public Tasks(String str) { // initializing the field taskName taskName = str; } // Printing the task name and then sleeps for 1 sec // The complete process is getting repeated five times public void run() { try { for (int j = 0; j <= 5; j++) { if (j="=" 0) date dt="new" date(); simpledateformat sdf="new" simpledateformat('hh : mm ss'); prints the initialization time for every task system.out.println('initialization name: '+ taskname + '=" + sdf.format(dt)); } else { Date dt = new Date(); SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat(" hh execution system.out.println('time of is complete.'); } catch(interruptedexception ie) ie.printstacktrace(); public class threadpoolexample maximum number threads in thread pool static final int max_th="3;" main method void main(string argvs[]) creating five new tasks runnable rb1="new" tasks('task 1'); rb2="new" 2'); rb3="new" 3'); rb4="new" 4'); rb5="new" 5'); a with size fixed executorservice pl="Executors.newFixedThreadPool(MAX_TH);" passes objects to execute (step 3) pl.execute(rb1); pl.execute(rb2); pl.execute(rb3); pl.execute(rb4); pl.execute(rb5); shutdown pl.shutdown(); < pre> <p> <strong>Output:</strong> </p> <pre> Initialization time for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 02 Initialization time for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 02 Initialization time for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 02 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 08 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 08 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 08 task 2 is complete. Initialization time for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 09 task 1 is complete. Initialization time for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 09 task 3 is complete. Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 10 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 10 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 11 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 11 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 12 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 12 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 13 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 13 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 14 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 14 task 4 is complete. task 5 is complete. </pre> <p> <strong>Explanation:</strong> It is evident by looking at the output of the program that tasks 4 and 5 are executed only when the thread has an idle thread. Until then, the extra tasks are put in the queue.</p> <p>The takeaway from the above example is when one wants to execute 50 tasks but is not willing to create 50 threads. In such a case, one can create a pool of 10 threads. Thus, 10 out of 50 tasks are assigned, and the rest are put in the queue. Whenever any thread out of 10 threads becomes idle, it picks up the 11<sup>th </sup>task. The other pending tasks are treated the same way.</p> <h2>Risks involved in Thread Pools</h2> <p>The following are the risk involved in the thread pools.</p> <p> <strong>Deadlock:</strong> It is a known fact that deadlock can come in any program that involves multithreading, and a thread pool introduces another scenario of deadlock. Consider a scenario where all the threads that are executing are waiting for the results from the threads that are blocked and waiting in the queue because of the non-availability of threads for the execution.</p> <p> <strong>Thread Leakage:</strong> Leakage of threads occurs when a thread is being removed from the pool to execute a task but is not returning to it after the completion of the task. For example, when a thread throws the exception and the pool class is not able to catch this exception, then the thread exits and reduces the thread pool size by 1. If the same thing repeats a number of times, then there are fair chances that the pool will become empty, and hence, there are no threads available in the pool for executing other requests.</p> <p> <strong>Resource Thrashing:</strong> A lot of time is wasted in context switching among threads when the size of the thread pool is very large. Whenever there are more threads than the optimal number may cause the starvation problem, and it leads to resource thrashing.</p> <h2>Points to Remember</h2> <p>Do not queue the tasks that are concurrently waiting for the results obtained from the other tasks. It may lead to a deadlock situation, as explained above.</p> <p>Care must be taken whenever threads are used for the operation that is long-lived. It may result in the waiting of thread forever and will finally lead to the leakage of the resource.</p> <p>In the end, the thread pool has to be ended explicitly. If it does not happen, then the program continues to execute, and it never ends. Invoke the shutdown() method on the thread pool to terminate the executor. Note that if someone tries to send another task to the executor after shutdown, it will throw a RejectedExecutionException.</p> <p>One needs to understand the tasks to effectively tune the thread pool. If the given tasks are contrasting, then one should look for pools for executing different varieties of tasks so that one can properly tune them.</p> <p>To reduce the probability of running JVM out of memory, one can control the maximum threads that can run in JVM. The thread pool cannot create new threads after it has reached the maximum limit.</p> <p>A thread pool can use the same used thread if the thread has finished its execution. Thus, the time and resources used for the creation of a new thread are saved.</p> <h2>Tuning the Thread Pool</h2> <p>The accurate size of a thread pool is decided by the number of available processors and the type of tasks the threads have to execute. If a system has the P processors that have only got the computation type processes, then the maximum size of the thread pool of P or P + 1 achieves the maximum efficiency. However, the tasks may have to wait for I/O, and in such a scenario, one has to take into consideration the ratio of the waiting time (W) and the service time (S) for the request; resulting in the maximum size of the pool P * (1 + W / S) for the maximum efficiency.</p> <h2>Conclusion</h2> <p>A thread pool is a very handy tool for organizing applications, especially on the server-side. Concept-wise, a thread pool is very easy to comprehend. However, one may have to look at a lot of issues when dealing with a thread pool. It is because the thread pool comes with some risks involved it (risks are discussed above).</p> <hr></=></pre></10;>pobierz ten przykładPrzykład puli wątków: 2
Zobaczmy inny przykład puli wątków.
Nazwa pliku: ThreadPoolExample.java
// important import statements import java.util.Date; import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService; import java.util.concurrent.Executors; import java.text.SimpleDateFormat; class Tasks implements Runnable { private String taskName; // constructor of the class Tasks public Tasks(String str) { // initializing the field taskName taskName = str; } // Printing the task name and then sleeps for 1 sec // The complete process is getting repeated five times public void run() { try { for (int j = 0; j <= 5; j++) { if (j="=" 0) date dt="new" date(); simpledateformat sdf="new" simpledateformat(\'hh : mm ss\'); prints the initialization time for every task system.out.println(\'initialization name: \'+ taskname + \'=" + sdf.format(dt)); } else { Date dt = new Date(); SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat(" hh execution system.out.println(\'time of is complete.\'); } catch(interruptedexception ie) ie.printstacktrace(); public class threadpoolexample maximum number threads in thread pool static final int max_th="3;" main method void main(string argvs[]) creating five new tasks runnable rb1="new" tasks(\'task 1\'); rb2="new" 2\'); rb3="new" 3\'); rb4="new" 4\'); rb5="new" 5\'); a with size fixed executorservice pl="Executors.newFixedThreadPool(MAX_TH);" passes objects to execute (step 3) pl.execute(rb1); pl.execute(rb2); pl.execute(rb3); pl.execute(rb4); pl.execute(rb5); shutdown pl.shutdown(); < pre> <p> <strong>Output:</strong> </p> <pre> Initialization time for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 02 Initialization time for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 02 Initialization time for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 02 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 04 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 05 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 06 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 07 Time of execution for the task name: task 1 = 06 : 13 : 08 Time of execution for the task name: task 2 = 06 : 13 : 08 Time of execution for the task name: task 3 = 06 : 13 : 08 task 2 is complete. Initialization time for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 09 task 1 is complete. Initialization time for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 09 task 3 is complete. Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 10 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 10 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 11 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 11 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 12 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 12 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 13 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 13 Time of execution for the task name: task 4 = 06 : 13 : 14 Time of execution for the task name: task 5 = 06 : 13 : 14 task 4 is complete. task 5 is complete. </pre> <p> <strong>Explanation:</strong> It is evident by looking at the output of the program that tasks 4 and 5 are executed only when the thread has an idle thread. Until then, the extra tasks are put in the queue.</p> <p>The takeaway from the above example is when one wants to execute 50 tasks but is not willing to create 50 threads. In such a case, one can create a pool of 10 threads. Thus, 10 out of 50 tasks are assigned, and the rest are put in the queue. Whenever any thread out of 10 threads becomes idle, it picks up the 11<sup>th </sup>task. The other pending tasks are treated the same way.</p> <h2>Risks involved in Thread Pools</h2> <p>The following are the risk involved in the thread pools.</p> <p> <strong>Deadlock:</strong> It is a known fact that deadlock can come in any program that involves multithreading, and a thread pool introduces another scenario of deadlock. Consider a scenario where all the threads that are executing are waiting for the results from the threads that are blocked and waiting in the queue because of the non-availability of threads for the execution.</p> <p> <strong>Thread Leakage:</strong> Leakage of threads occurs when a thread is being removed from the pool to execute a task but is not returning to it after the completion of the task. For example, when a thread throws the exception and the pool class is not able to catch this exception, then the thread exits and reduces the thread pool size by 1. If the same thing repeats a number of times, then there are fair chances that the pool will become empty, and hence, there are no threads available in the pool for executing other requests.</p> <p> <strong>Resource Thrashing:</strong> A lot of time is wasted in context switching among threads when the size of the thread pool is very large. Whenever there are more threads than the optimal number may cause the starvation problem, and it leads to resource thrashing.</p> <h2>Points to Remember</h2> <p>Do not queue the tasks that are concurrently waiting for the results obtained from the other tasks. It may lead to a deadlock situation, as explained above.</p> <p>Care must be taken whenever threads are used for the operation that is long-lived. It may result in the waiting of thread forever and will finally lead to the leakage of the resource.</p> <p>In the end, the thread pool has to be ended explicitly. If it does not happen, then the program continues to execute, and it never ends. Invoke the shutdown() method on the thread pool to terminate the executor. Note that if someone tries to send another task to the executor after shutdown, it will throw a RejectedExecutionException.</p> <p>One needs to understand the tasks to effectively tune the thread pool. If the given tasks are contrasting, then one should look for pools for executing different varieties of tasks so that one can properly tune them.</p> <p>To reduce the probability of running JVM out of memory, one can control the maximum threads that can run in JVM. The thread pool cannot create new threads after it has reached the maximum limit.</p> <p>A thread pool can use the same used thread if the thread has finished its execution. Thus, the time and resources used for the creation of a new thread are saved.</p> <h2>Tuning the Thread Pool</h2> <p>The accurate size of a thread pool is decided by the number of available processors and the type of tasks the threads have to execute. If a system has the P processors that have only got the computation type processes, then the maximum size of the thread pool of P or P + 1 achieves the maximum efficiency. However, the tasks may have to wait for I/O, and in such a scenario, one has to take into consideration the ratio of the waiting time (W) and the service time (S) for the request; resulting in the maximum size of the pool P * (1 + W / S) for the maximum efficiency.</p> <h2>Conclusion</h2> <p>A thread pool is a very handy tool for organizing applications, especially on the server-side. Concept-wise, a thread pool is very easy to comprehend. However, one may have to look at a lot of issues when dealing with a thread pool. It is because the thread pool comes with some risks involved it (risks are discussed above).</p> <hr></=> Wyjaśnienie: Patrząc na wynik programu, widać wyraźnie, że zadania 4 i 5 są wykonywane tylko wtedy, gdy wątek ma nieaktywny wątek. Do tego czasu dodatkowe zadania czekają w kolejce.
wywołaj funkcję js z HTML
Wniosek z powyższego przykładu jest taki, że ktoś chce wykonać 50 zadań, ale nie chce tworzyć 50 wątków. W takim przypadku można utworzyć pulę 10 wątków. W ten sposób przydziela się 10 z 50 zadań, a resztę umieszcza się w kolejce. Ilekroć jakikolwiek wątek z 10 wątków stanie się bezczynny, wybiera 11tzadanie. Pozostałe oczekujące zadania są traktowane w ten sam sposób.
Ryzyko związane z pulami wątków
Poniżej przedstawiono ryzyko związane z pulami wątków.
Impas: Wiadomo, że zakleszczenie może wystąpić w każdym programie wymagającym wielowątkowości, a pula wątków wprowadza inny scenariusz zakleszczenia. Rozważmy scenariusz, w którym wszystkie wykonujące się wątki czekają na wyniki z wątków, które są zablokowane i czekają w kolejce z powodu niedostępności wątków do wykonania.
Wyciek wątku: Wyciek wątków ma miejsce wtedy, gdy wątek jest usuwany z puli w celu wykonania zadania, ale nie wraca do niej po zakończeniu zadania. Na przykład, gdy wątek zgłasza wyjątek, a klasa puli nie jest w stanie przechwycić tego wyjątku, wątek kończy działanie i zmniejsza rozmiar puli wątków o 1. Jeśli to samo powtórzy się kilka razy, istnieje spore prawdopodobieństwo, że pula stanie się pusta, w związku z czym nie będzie w niej dostępnych wątków do wykonywania innych żądań.
Miotanie zasobów: Dużo czasu jest marnowane na przełączanie kontekstu między wątkami, gdy rozmiar puli wątków jest bardzo duży. Ilekroć jest więcej wątków niż optymalna liczba, może to spowodować problem głodu i prowadzi do utraty zasobów.
Punkty do zapamiętania
Nie umieszczaj w kolejce zadań, które oczekują jednocześnie na wyniki uzyskane z innych zadań. Może to prowadzić do sytuacji impasu, jak wyjaśniono powyżej.
Należy zachować ostrożność, gdy gwinty są używane do operacji, które są długotrwałe. Może to skutkować wiecznym oczekiwaniem wątku i ostatecznie doprowadzić do wycieku zasobu.
Na koniec pula wątków musi zostać jawnie zakończona. Jeśli tak się nie stanie, program będzie wykonywał się dalej i nigdy się nie zakończy. Wywołaj metodę Shutdown() w puli wątków, aby zakończyć moduł wykonujący. Pamiętaj, że jeśli ktoś spróbuje wysłać kolejne zadanie do modułu wykonującego po zamknięciu, zgłosi wyjątek RejectedExecutionException.
Aby skutecznie dostroić pulę wątków, należy zrozumieć zadania. Jeśli dane zadania są kontrastowe, należy szukać pul do wykonywania różnych odmian zadań, aby móc je odpowiednio dostroić.
Aby zmniejszyć prawdopodobieństwo, że JVM zabraknie pamięci, można kontrolować maksymalną liczbę wątków, które można uruchomić w JVM. Pula wątków nie może tworzyć nowych wątków po osiągnięciu maksymalnego limitu.
Pula wątków może używać tego samego używanego wątku, jeśli wątek zakończył swoje wykonywanie. Oszczędza się w ten sposób czas i zasoby użyte do utworzenia nowego wątku.
próba złapania Java
Dostrajanie puli wątków
Dokładny rozmiar puli wątków zależy od liczby dostępnych procesorów i rodzaju zadań, które muszą wykonać wątki. Jeśli system ma procesory P, które obsługują tylko procesy typu obliczeniowego, wówczas maksymalną wydajność osiąga maksymalny rozmiar puli wątków P lub P + 1. Jednakże zadania mogą wymagać oczekiwania na we/wy i w takim scenariuszu należy wziąć pod uwagę stosunek czasu oczekiwania (W) do czasu obsługi (S) dla żądania; co daje maksymalny rozmiar basenu P* (1 + W/S) dla maksymalnej wydajności.
Wniosek
Pula wątków jest bardzo przydatnym narzędziem do organizowania aplikacji, szczególnie po stronie serwera. Pod względem koncepcyjnym pula wątków jest bardzo łatwa do zrozumienia. Jednak w przypadku puli wątków może być konieczne rozważenie wielu problemów. Dzieje się tak dlatego, że pula wątków wiąże się z pewnym ryzykiem (ryzyka omówiono powyżej).